![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Not long ago, we were having a conversation as to whether Boston or Manchester was more northern. Now, apart from the fact that Boston is in Lincolnshire, and thus clearly south of Manchester, I was confused by this.
I still am confused by this, and as I am a bear of very little brain, y'all will have to help.
According to Benedict's globe, and my Peters projection, and I can't find a handy Mercator projection, but I'm sure it's not that much different, according to those sources, the UK is north of all of the US except Alaska.
Is this wrong? Is there some other definition of north which I'm not taking into account?
I still am confused by this, and as I am a bear of very little brain, y'all will have to help.
According to Benedict's globe, and my Peters projection, and I can't find a handy Mercator projection, but I'm sure it's not that much different, according to those sources, the UK is north of all of the US except Alaska.
Is this wrong? Is there some other definition of north which I'm not taking into account?
no subject
Date: 2004-03-25 01:42 am (UTC)I remember the fuss about the dawn of the Millenium, when people were surprised that East Anglia wasn't the eastern-most part of the country. IIRC that point was somewhere near Dover. We get used to maps that tilt the UK upright.
I lived in High Wycombe for three years without realising it was to the North of London. I didn't do O level Geography, funnily enough!
no subject
Date: 2004-03-25 02:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-25 03:33 am (UTC)I'm sure there's a Manchester in the States, so there still might be a sense in which it's so. Doesn't seem likely, though.
no subject
Date: 2004-03-25 04:50 am (UTC)