Account name:
Password
(OpenID?)
(Forgot it?)
Remember Me
You're viewing
ghoti_mhic_uait
's journal
Create a Dreamwidth Account
Learn More
Interest
Region
Site and Account
FAQ
Email
Reload page in style:
site
light
ghoti_mhic_uait
Only mono has the answer
Only
mono
has the answer
Jan
.
7th
,
2004
05:48 pm
ghoti_mhic_uait
- ghoti has dominated Captain Jack Sparrow
YOu always knew I must have a top in me really, didn't you?
Current Mood:
amused
Flat
|
Top-Level Comments Only
no subject
Date:
2004-01-07 11:54 am (UTC)
From:
sath.livejournal.com
Hell yes! Make it a threesome!
no subject
Date:
2004-01-07 11:57 am (UTC)
From:
ghoti.livejournal.com
From that position, I can more or less have any woman I choose. Good, no?
no subject
Date:
2004-01-07 12:02 pm (UTC)
From:
sath.livejournal.com
Enviable :)
no subject
Date:
2004-01-07 12:46 pm (UTC)
From:
marnanel.livejournal.com
And I'd guess quite a few nonwomen as well.
no subject
Date:
2004-01-07 02:03 pm (UTC)
From:
ghoti.livejournal.com
I'm less convinced of *my* pulling power on the men that the Captain doesn't reach, however.
This is sexist and bad, but true, nevertheless.
no subject
Date:
2004-01-07 03:02 pm (UTC)
From:
firinel.livejournal.com
My preference is with
ghoti
over Jack Sparrow.
no subject
Date:
2004-01-07 03:43 pm (UTC)
From:
ghoti.livejournal.com
*kiss*
no subject
Date:
2004-01-07 03:13 pm (UTC)
From:
marnanel.livejournal.com
Logistically, wouldn't the important thing be your pulling power on the men that the Captain DOES reach?
no subject
Date:
2004-01-07 03:43 pm (UTC)
From:
ghoti.livejournal.com
I was more thinking that with women, either he or I could probably pull them all, because he'd get the ones I couldn't on my own, and vice versa.
Does that make sense?
no subject
Date:
2004-01-07 02:14 pm (UTC)
From:
cjwatson
Hell, I'm straight and
I'd
have to think before refusing. Captain Jack rocks.
no subject
Date:
2004-01-07 04:01 pm (UTC)
From:
briggsy.livejournal.com
I'd hang around him and pick up the women that Jack didn't pull that night ;)
no subject
Date:
2004-01-09 04:05 am (UTC)
From:
ghoti.livejournal.com
That would more or less be my plan, too. mmm... women...
no subject
Date:
2004-01-08 05:05 am (UTC)
From:
ewx.livejournal.com
I wondered about all the slaps he got.
13 comments
Reply
Flat
|
Top-Level Comments Only
Profile
ghoti_mhic_uait
Recent Entries
Archive
Reading
Tags
Memories
Profile
November
2024
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
Most Popular Tags
30 day music meme
-
29 uses
7days7recipes
-
5 uses
andreas
-
11 uses
baby
-
6 uses
baking
-
5 uses
benedict
-
6 uses
bobcat in a box
-
8 uses
book swap
-
5 uses
books
-
49 uses
breakfast
-
9 uses
chicken
-
5 uses
children
-
6 uses
chocolate
-
4 uses
clothes
-
6 uses
colin
-
13 uses
cookbook project
-
23 uses
crochet
-
6 uses
cycling
-
5 uses
december days
-
29 uses
dinner
-
8 uses
doll
-
10 uses
dolls
-
6 uses
family
-
5 uses
films
-
30 uses
food
-
27 uses
games
-
25 uses
garden
-
8 uses
home ed
-
5 uses
icons
-
11 uses
jesse tree
-
9 uses
judith
-
44 uses
knitting
-
29 uses
lunch
-
7 uses
meme
-
56 uses
music
-
17 uses
organisation
-
8 uses
pandemic legacy
-
8 uses
photos
-
10 uses
pictures
-
7 uses
politics
-
12 uses
poll
-
12 uses
real life
-
40 uses
resolutions
-
8 uses
secret pal 10
-
7 uses
socks
-
6 uses
tv
-
12 uses
vegetables
-
7 uses
via ljapp
-
4 uses
wedding
-
7 uses
work
-
5 uses
Page Summary
sath.livejournal.com
-
(no subject)
ewx.livejournal.com
-
(no subject)
Style Credit
Style:
Neutral Good
for
Practicality
by
timeasmymeasure
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 27th, 2025 04:04 pm
Powered by
Dreamwidth Studios
no subject
Date: 2004-01-07 11:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-07 11:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-07 12:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-07 12:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-07 02:03 pm (UTC)This is sexist and bad, but true, nevertheless.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-07 03:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-07 03:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-07 03:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-07 03:43 pm (UTC)Does that make sense?
no subject
Date: 2004-01-07 02:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-07 04:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-09 04:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-08 05:05 am (UTC)